
When the Bubsy in: The Purrfect Collection was announced, the news received hundreds of thousands of shares and millions of cumulative views. This, friends, is a stark reminder of the strength of nostalgia, an evocative sensation that can stir the heart and cloud the memory.
Let’s be clear: Bubsy the Bobcat has never had a good game. While Bubsy: The Woolies Strike Back (2017) and Bubsy: Paws On Fire! (2019) — neither present in this collection — are certainly more playable than the '90s titles, they were still met with a lukewarm reception.
At the time of Bubsy’s Super Nintendo debut in 1993, some publications were impressed with its digitised soundbites, character animation, humour, and colourful graphics; while others criticised it heavily for its shortcomings. Regardless, it sold well enough to spawn sequels up to and including the PlayStation era.

The Purrfect Collection combines five Bubsy retro titles if counting the Game Boy version of Bubsy II independently, as it’s very different from its console cousins. The frontend presentation is good, cartoony, and fitting, with nice, clean menus and plenty of bonuses, from galleries spanning original advertisements and box art, to recorded developer interviews chopped up into individual questions.
Every retro Bubsy release is here, including those cross-platform entries on Super Nintendo and Mega Drive. One interesting inclusion is the Super Famicom version with its regional voice acting; the only 16-bit-era Bubsy title released in Japan, after which they presumably couldn't stand the sight of him. There’s a music player for those who enjoy pain, save states, screen adjustments, and wallpaper borders, as well as a somewhat lacklustre CRT filter. The collection also includes a rewind function, and, while this is a feature I generally dislike, here its presence has never been more crucial. After administering it once or twice, one can barely imagine slogging through any Bubsy game without it, in fact.

The first two Bubsy titles run slightly quicker on Mega Drive than Super Nintendo, but with muted colours and weaker sound. All suck. The initial game, Bubsy in: Claws Encounters of the Furred Kind, starts you with nine lives - and that’s less a “cats-have-nine-lives” gag and more a crude patch for how broken the controls are and how poorly arranged everything is.
Busby is a one-hit-kill affair, and if you so much as graze anything you shouldn’t, it’s back to a checkpoint. The control inertia is one of the most egregious in any 2D platform game, with Bubsy being breeze block slow from a stationary position, to racing flat-out within two seconds of picking up speed. It’s a game where the design teams seemingly worked on opposite sides of the world: one engineering the character with Sonic-like zip; the other building maps that are totally antithetical to fast movement. Bubsy moves too quickly and, even though he runs with ample room on the right of the screen, it’s still almost impossible to avoid obstacles at full pelt. The stages are a hellscape of unavoidable, seemingly random pitfalls that require you to either inch along or learn every myriad avenue in a repetitive trial-by-fire.

Bubsy has pitiful aerial mobility and is barely adjustable during a jump, leading to hilarious deaths when trying to land on the head of an inert enemy. It often feels akin to digital bull-wrangling, with you driving your thumb into the D-Pad in a futile attempt to redirect him. The jump's shortcomings are somewhat ameliorated by a glide manoeuvre that sends Bubsy left and right as he travels downward, but this, like everything else, will usually get you killed too.
It’s often difficult to know what can hurt you, what qualifies as a ledge and what doesn’t, and the collision detection is hilariously poor, where in some instances you will pass through an obstacle just fine, only to be killed by the same obstacle on a subsequent meeting. As if all this wasn’t bad enough, the stage designers do utterly nonsensical things like placing traps on rollercoasters that kick you off after a whole two-second ride, or send you spiralling down drawn-out winding waterways to your death.
Beyond all these problems, the absolute worst design decision is that Bubsy — a platform game character — dies if he falls from too great a height. It’s absolutely ridiculous, and even more so in a game where the cavernous layouts and cropped screen parameters mean you rarely know where the next leap of faith will actually take you.

Its sequel, Bubsy II, set in a theme park world with selectable historical zones, carries over many of the same issues. The stages are more enclosed and maze-like, making for a painfully boring game where you move around an endless, samey sprawl of cut and paste backgrounds, battling marginally-improved but still-terrible control inertia, while searching for doors that teleport you to other doors, and then to other doors again, and occasionally back to the beginning door. It’s confusing to know what are platforms versus background art, especially in the Egyptian zone, and the haphazard nature of the placement of everything feels even more prominent this time around.
It’s worth noting also, that Bubsy II has some of the worst music in a 16-bit game, challenging the Mega Drive’s Taz-Mania for that particular crown. The routine ear-bleeding cacophony even accompanies your adventure in the music-themed zone, where you’re jumping across saxophones, octaves, and quavers. It’s bewildering.
To Bubsy II’s credit, however, it does away with the much-maligned one-hit-kill and allows the bobcat three health bumps, which eases tensions considerably. It also has a kind-of-fun frog-firing bonus game and sections where Bubsy pilots a space ship and then a biplane through impossible terrain. And, if for some reason you want to endure torture with a friend, local multiplayer co-op still functions here.

Bubsy II for Game Boy is a calamitous mess: slow, horrible, and barely playable. There’s no reason for it to be here except for completeness.
Bubsy in: Fractured Furry Tales for Atari’s incredibly, truly powerful (no really, promise) 64-bit Jaguar really flexes the big cat's CPU, reusing assets for the third time, having poorer parallax depth than the 16-bit entries, and bringing back the one-hit-kill while maintaining awful inertia controls, tragic jumping mobility, crappy collision detection and flaky hit-boxes. What it does right, however, is get rid of those terrible hacked-together maze stages to make things more streamlined. Yes, it’s still comprised of overly-large maps, but there’s more of a general direction. The music, too, after its predecessor’s keyboard-on-the-fritz oeuvre, is at least listenable. That said, it’s still a hair-tearingly frustrating game, full of terrible enemy placements and myriad stage design problems. You’ll do well to play it more than 10 minutes before throwing in the towel.

Finally, Bubsy 3D for the Sony PlayStation, infamously awful and the butt of a thousand jokes, rounds off the collection. And, considering the quality up until this point, it’s a wonder anyone expected anything more. Abominably bad, unplayable trash, powered only by its constant and invasive speech, it’s glitchy, the camera is a mess, and it’s woefully imprecise to hit a yawning platform right in front of you.
For this release, though, Bubsy 3D has been given new modern controls, assigning the camera to the right stick to improve the experience. Yet it doesn’t. It’s a game so timelessly terrible that the overhauled inputs do little to improve its bearability. Unless you’re a pure masochist, it’s pointless to even hit start on it.
This, I realise, isn’t exactly a glowing review. But, despite what angry Bubsy enthusiasts may say, it’s an honest one. What Bubsy does best is in its humour, its wackiness, its personality, and the quips that pepper the series. And this is probably what made it interesting in the first place: a catty cat with a '90s wryness and a Rocko’s Modern Life-style irreverence.

But it's also a demonstration of why Japan ruled during this programming era, and why so many Western developers, seemingly incapable of understanding basic jumping weight and inventive stage layouts, struggled to find the mark. To that end, the Bobcat has endured far, far beyond his natural shelf life. If nostalgia alone is really enough to tease that cash from your wallet, be my guest.
Conclusion
One wonders if the entire Bubsy series wasn’t actually designed as a sort of torture parody; that the intention all along was to pummel unsuspecting children into submission via an innocent-looking, anthropomorphic-bobcat-led platform game.
Picture this: some kid in 1993 got Bubsy for Christmas after the sales clerk told his parents that Sonic and Mario were old hat, and this was the hot new thing. That kid either never forgave his parents for the injustice and the playground bullying they endured as a result, or they committed fully to the Bubsy universe and found a happy place within it. If you’re the latter, then this collection is for you. And only for you.
Comments 129
This has to be one of the most pointless releases in a long time.
Why? What was the point? The games are still bad AND there's no nostalgia towards them. The infamy is the only thing it has.
But then again, this is money-starved Atari that's involved here.
While I compliment them for trying, Bubsy was always very mediocre at best. I don't even know anyone who's even remotely positive about Bubsy. An old school friend of mine had one of the games on his SNES and I absolutely hated it. I guess only collectors would be remotely interested in getting this for nostalgic reasons. But otherwise, I can't imagine this collection selling well, at all.
Limited Run Games just... take care of releasing physical copies ok? GRID Autosport still doesn't have a physical.
This is how a similar Sonic collection would score if people weren't conditioned to get a hit of dopamine from the sound effects.
I was there when Bubsy was first introduced, trying to capitalize on the popularity of Sonic. Rented the game for my SNES and had a terrible, terrible time. The developers had no idea what they were doing. Everything said in this review is spot on. How does a garbage series like this persist and get a collection... well, the great thing is no one is forced to play it. It's just laughable that this exists at all.
I feel like the score is kind of unfair. It sounds like the collection itself is great, just the games in it aren't. Which then begs the question of what is actually being reviewed.
I have no stake in this since I've never actually played any of these games and I've heard they're very bad so I guess the score is justified in that sense. But that would also mean there's no way the score could ever be any higher than this no matter what they do.
Either way I appreciate games being preserved even if they're bad.
Western developed platformers, was pure horror.
Did the mistake of buying Bubsy for SNES, back in the day, but thankfully, I could return if for a full refund.
People complain about, modern games being crap. But they seem to forget, just how bad it was back in the 80:s-90:s as well, when the nostalgia goggles falls off.
I still prefer Bubsy over any Sonic Game I ever played.
Bubsy II is terrible though.
Loved playing the original on the Mega Drive, but dont really remember it being more or less frustrating than Lion King.
But I am starting to stop myself getting any other games just for nostalgia. Turrican collection 1&2, Collection of Mana, etc. i'm looking at you, never going to play them but just remember playing them back in the day
Thanks for the review, still interested in getting this at some point (and so also quite discounted and not just because it's practically digital-only for me here in Italy) to see these games in action myself and who knows, maybe even enjoy at least some aspects of them to some extent like some apparently do based on comments even on this very site, not to mention that even such games being preserved and accessible officially is good, period - that said, of course I'm now first and foremost looking forward to the upcoming Bubsy 4D which based on what I've seen/heard of seems great!
@Exerion76 I agree with you. There were so many bad and mediocre games on old platforms! Shovelware is not something new, but it has become more numerous. But thanks to the internet it's become much easier to separate the wheat from the chaff.
Very refreshing to see a review tear Bubsy a new one. I’ll always get behind clowning on Bubsy. If I ever end up purchasing this, it will be in deep discount and solely for the memes (which I understand is the whole point of doing anything Bubsy related these days, but still).
With that said, though, the upcoming Bubsy 4D actually looks unironically good, and having heard some people’s impressions of the game and the fact that it’s being handled by a competent developer this time, I’ll be watching it with careful optimism.
Bad games should be preserved too. Plus it will be fun to look back at if the new Bubsy turns out good.
I do have "nostalgia" for the original Bubsy since it was among the very first video games I ever owned on the SNES. My sister and I spent many weekend evenings trying to beat that stupid game, but we never did... That said, it did create some memories, so there's that, but I'd never want to revisit it or any of the past entries. Bubsy 4D doesn't look bad though.
I'm not really sure who this collection was for except the most devout believers of video game preservation and the industry's history.
I'll be getting it as I have a lot of nostalgia for the SNES GAME (that one was good IMO) and would like to try the others, especially the infamous Bubsy 3D!
Also the series has a genuinely interesting backstory like the Bubsy 2 developers hanging his plushy (by a noise) in the office and Bubsy 3D developers trying to make one of the first 3D platformers and being horrified when they saw Mario 64 for first time! Looking forward to hearing more about this in the video interviews. To me it's like Tetris Forever, in that I'm partly buying it for the historical significance and interest in the franchise story. And bad games can be entertaining in a funny way, just like bad films!
It's really sad that his creator died recently and won't see Bubsy 4D which has potential to be first really great Bubsy, being developed by the Demon Turf team who I have a lot of faith in.
Dark secret time: I was a Bubsy kid. I had 1 and 2 for the SNES, and I distinctly remember renting 3 for PS1 from Hollywood Video. To this day I can say "Go for baroque" and my mom will laugh, and if someone is cooking steaks I'll tell them to throw another dillo on the grill. I never beat any of them, but I have several fond memories of desperately trying...to, you know, make it past level 3...
...I have absolutely no interest in going back.
Wow, a collection of notoriously bad games got a bad score? Im shocked... SHOCKED!!
I remember renting a Bubsy game on the SNES, and even at a young age, I knew I never wanted to play it again.
I do get that bad games should be preserved too, but me personally, I can't justify this at any price. This isn't going to help sell the masses on the latest Bubsy game, haha.
I agree with others above: it seems like the review for a nostalgia-targeted compilation like this should be focused on emulation quality, completeness, extra features, menu design, et al. Anything but the games themselves (which aren't irrelevant but don't we have decades- long history of these games getting 4/10 type scores? what's the point of another?)
It's great that even terrible games are being preserved like this. That being said, I will not be picking this up unless it goes on sale for very cheap, and I have mates coming round I wanna play a drinking game of dying in Bubsy 3D with.
Also, what are people talking about? This review seems very fair. It sounds like without the emulation and things surrounding the games being so good, this would have been a 1. Reviewer mentions all this. A collection of anything is about what's in the collection most of all. If I buy a collection of rubbish books I don't rate it a 10 because the binding and cover art is nice.
I might want to get this in the future. Bubsy 3D is a historically interesting game, I want to try it out one of these days.
Also the collection includes a GB version and even a Jaguar game? That's really good in my view, it shows they're really going all-in to do right by the fans. Seems like a solid collection.
@FlyingDunsparce You're saying it should have just been reviewed based on the competency of the presentation? Do you enjoy game collections for merely being an accessible collection of any games? Why would the games themselves not be factored into the review deliberation? Besides, the reviewer gave "pros" for all that stuff. My guess is the score would have been even worse without that level of commitment to the package.
bubsy
bubsy
bubsy
bubsy
bobcaaaaat
It's kind of wild, since I'm sure a lot of effort went into putting this together. For evidently really crappy games. Ouch.
Oh how I remember getting Bubsy at launch for the SNES. If I had a time machine I would go back and slap myself for doing so. I will say, however, I did enjoy some of the music from the first game.
Removed - inappropriate
Don't worry, they still got a chance with Bubsy 4D
gotta love how there is general agreement that Bubsy games are terrible, but there is support for the series regardless
Bubsy is probably the only collection where the games being terrible are a selling point.
I agree with the closing comments that I think this game is a parody of a bad game on purpose. I believe it would qualify as a kusoge.
@FlyingDunsparce I feel like the score woud have been a 2 or 3 if the presentation wasn't good. So it sounds like a fair assessment. It's obviously the games being reviewed, and they gave some points for at least the presentation.
I love that this is a thing and it is one of the dumbest releases in gaming ever!
Bubsy is an interesting footnote in gaming history though and is the poster child for the folly of artificially trying to create a mascot platformer to rival Mario and Sonic.
Those guys aren't iconic because of the characters, they are iconic because the games are superb.
I STILL remember renting this for my SNES and being SO excited to play it. I love cats and this was a cat with an attitude. About 20 minutes in I hated it. THEN I was like, well it must be bad on SNES, let me rent the Genesis game.... Also terrible. I had forgotten how bad these games were until I saw this.
My mom rented Bubsy II for me when I was a kid, and it made me cry. Not because I didn't like the game (I didn't), but because renting a game was a rare treat and I felt that the game had spoiled her kind act.
I wanted to like these games so badly. Much of my childhood was spent with the idea that a video game should be as close to an interactive cartoon as possible, and Bubsy embraced a sort of cartooniness I loved. Fortunately, I was smart enough to rent from Blockbuster first. I was a very forgiving child, but even I could tell they were duds.
Bubsy is proof that Mario could have gone as fast as Sonic if Nintendo wanted to, and a lesson in why they didn't.
I have to admit "There’s a music player for those who enjoy pain" made me chuckle. No surprise on the final score. I am curious what kind of review Bubsy 4D will get.
Unfortunately I imagine the odd uninformed parent or young child may pick this up, and maybe they'll have half an hour of wacky fun with this. But probably not.
I remember that was me as a child - I had access to Bubsy 1 on SNES and just remember feeling like I liked the character, but nothing much past that. I can vividly remember some of those cheap deaths, and admittedly I didn't think I ever got past those first fee levels anyway.
I'm sure there'll be an minor audience for this, but I fear the buyers' remorse will be all too real once the "hilarious/ironic" novelty wears off, the YouTube clicks stop coming, and the games' sheer bang-average-at-best-ness rears its head after the first 15 minutes or so.
Ouch. I played the original for hours back in the day (although my memories of it are entirely from the first stage). I even found enjoyment from Bubsy 3D once I found the rhythm of it's slow methodical platforming. I'm interested in going back to see what I think of them all now
A long, long time ago, I used to rent the first Bubsy game. I kinda enjoyed it for what it was. It was frustrating, and I think the levels and gameplay just couldn't work with the hardware limitations.
The main drawback was not having a good view to see obstacles and plan ahead. If they remade the first original with the camera panning out, and made Bubsy more capable of taking hits, it would be an otherwise decent game.
But I played through that game, and started to memorize the stages, and thus it became playable to me. The game did have good graphics and music for the time.
I still wouldn't recommend them to anyone who doesn't have masochistic tendencies.
The sequels were all progressively worse.
From a preservation perspective I’m happy these games have been brought to a new generation.
As someone who enjoys things that are good, this should be cast into the fires of Mount Doom along with the One Ring.
@AussieMcBucket @Daniel36 I get what you're saying and obviously the games are what it's all about. But when it comes to a collection like this the games will all already have individual reviews you can look up. At that point just apply the score of the highest reviewed game to the collection as that's the best it will get with everything else being a bonus. Obviously barring any emulation/performance issues. In that case the score makes sense.
The reason I said the score was unfair is because I don't think it gives justice to the competency of the collection itself. A 4 is a failing grade which means the collection should've been better than it was. So let's ask three questions:
I'm pretty sure all of these question can be answered with YES. So then I wonder what else this collection should've done to earn a passing grade?
It's difficult in this case because you obviously don't want to give people the impression that these are good games. The 4 is a good way to make sure people know that. But it doesn't give the developers any feedback on what they could've done better other than that they shouldn't have made this collection to begin with.
I really don't know who was even asking for this collection.
only ever played the one on the snes at a relatives , and of course the worst game in the history of man the Atari Jaguar iteration which i own.
and yes its the worst of all games ever made.
I also have Zool2 on the Jaguar which is better,
Zool was cool back in the day, Busby , I just wanted to punch.
@AllBLK it could be a plot by the Russians.
they done cyber attacks and now there requesting re issues of the worst games ever made.
we wont let them kill gaming
@Tom-Massey The Super Famicom version publisher Poppo I think only otherwise published Iron Commando, a beat-em-up that can be argued has its own problems.
Nintendo themselves actually published the original game in some European countries. (there are two license variants of the PAL version)
But it in the case of the original Bubsy, I can only recommend that the Glide button should be used almost as much as the run button in Mario.
@KITG_GROUP There are FAR FAR FAR worse games than Bubsy. The bottom of the barrel on NES and SNES garbage games is far worse. I haven't looked at it but GBA has to have its own share of a trash.
All that will make the original Bubsy look like a masterpiece in comparison.
I understand why one of my favorite streamers The RetroPals use the original Bubsy as their median line for rating platformers "Is it better or worse than Bubsy?"
Bubsy 3D isn't hidden gem or anything like that but it doesn't deserve it's bad reputation. I hated it at first too but once I got the controls down, It was rather enjoyable. Water levels are bad and so are the bosses but other than that I didn't have any major complaints.
There are some spot's where falling down means doing a long section again but with this release you can save yourself from that pain by using save states.
Of course if the visual style make's your eye's bleed, perhaps then it's not worth trying, but otherwise I encourage giving it a fair shake.
@KingMike oh im sure there are worse. but Busby was so high profile at the time. He deserves the grief.
But then i never had a NES or Snes. my gaming started on the Sinclair Spectrum and Atari St , so my gaming experiences where quite different to the console crowd.
my first console was the Atari Jaguar. which I loved and still do as it does have some good games as well some of the worst.
"Every Bubsy release is here"
Unfortunately (or fortunately),

@SpaceboyScreams nah the Genesis Sonic games are a blast even on mute.
Genuinely surprised by this review. Bubsy is the first game that I recognized as a bad game, as a kid, in a time where I could enjoy anything. Haven’t been able to make heads or tales out of all the sudden love those games are getting.
Comparing Sonic with Bubsy is like comparing Mario Kart World with
Maria Kart World
Never liked the appearance of this mascot.
Yeah I might get it just for the nostalgia factor. The first game came out when I was in high school. I remember renting it and being a little frustrated with it and having a little better time with the second one. Never played the PS1 game.
Yikes! I haven’t played the game in a long time but this a bit harsher than I remember at least for the first game. That said it was never anybody’s favorite game, and I was never planning to get this. There are other much better retro collections to buy.
Hahaha. Thank you for this review. It was a breath of fresh air. I wonder if they made this compilation simply to remind everyone of how bad Bubsy WAS before releasing - what appears to be - the absolute BANGER of Bubsy 4D afterward? Because that game looks fantastic!
The story of Bubsy is a story of never giving up even when everyone else says you really REALLY should. It would almost be heart-warming if it didn't involve Josh Fairhurst
@SpaceboyScreams
This very same publication gave Sonic Origins a 8/10.
https://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/switch-eshop/sonic-origins
Might was well have included the modern entries for this, that would at least fluff the number of playable entries.
It's been said above, but bad games also deserve preservation. I'm happy Atari/LRG put real effort into this, despite knowing they could've just kicked out a barebones collection and try to collect some money off meme. I am curious why they left the modern games out of this collection though.
With that said, bad games are harder to swallow at higher price points. If this gets a deep discount, I will absolutely buy. Probably double dip on PC/Switch or Xbone.
@Splash_Woman I applaud your bravery in sharing this.
@FlyingDunsparce @The_Nintendo_Pedant I'd argue that people who HATE a certain game series (as the reviewer seems to) aren't best suited to review a collection of them in the first place. The fact that the review contains a major error in saying all the Bubsy games are here (there's two games missing) perhaps justifies my view.
@Suketoudara
completely agree.
this site regularly commits this sin, even sometimes having people who don't like an entire genre review games in that genre.
I mean really, what is the point? just don't review it then.
EDIT -
judgemental statements like this are gross:
"This, friends, is a stark reminder of the strength of nostalgia, an evocative sensation that can stir the heart and cloud the memory."
how does the writer know what is in the mind of a bubsy fan or anyone else? he doesn't. many of these fans probably remember these games rather well, and either like them anyway, or like them for their own reasons.
I found this review somewhat distasteful. and I can't stand bubsy lol.
The cat's out of the bag! ...Please put him back.
This is a release that shouldn’t happen. Zero people asked for a Bubsy compilation. Is it cool to have a compilation of one of the objectively worst series of games in history? Kinda, in an Ed Wood/Plan 9 kinda way. But that’s it. That’s not nearly enough to justify a purchase.
I love Bubsy and I'm the first person to say the games suck. Bubsy 4D is the only one that might break the tradition, and I hope it isn't the last.
That said, in an era of litigious companies (Nintendo included, but not the only offender) fighting against game preservation, collections like this are a blessing.
I remember the hype for this being pretty intense. This was going to be a Sonic and Mario beater. Turns out it was nowhere near either of them. It couldn’t even compete with the next tier of SNES/MD platformers (e.g. Decapattack, Tiny Toons, Addams Family, various Mickey Mouse games etc)
I'm so glad team cherry released this masterpiece after 6 years of catsanity, all the clown-noses and yarn posts were getting out of hand, and all the people spamming "Bubsy remake!" at every nintendo direct. It was crazy how people divided themselves into "what could possibly go wrong" and "doutbers"...
...What? Oh. I seem to have mixed up the hits with the misses again.
Tenatively excited for the new 4D game.
@BaldB3lper78 like TLOU2
@HammerKirby
yeah if anything the classic sonic games were some of those games i enjoyed much more when returning to them as an adult since i could appreciate things like the movement physics and how well everything flows together more. 3k is still my personal fave.
@The_Nintendo_Pedant To be fair: Is there a critic that is a fan of the Bubsy series? And if there is, should we trust their judgement about ANY video game?
Nice try, @Kuruwin or should I say, BUBSY
Sorry, no offense, but this review failed to answer the main question: Is this running well, or are there issues?
The reviewer is too busy whining about the games to actually talk about it, it's reduced to a point in the pros below, but many are going to skip that part, seeing that "4/10" is all that's going to matter to people.
Then again, Sonic Origins did receive a "8/10" here, and it certainly didn't deserve it, as it was seriously incomplete and buggy.
Also, there's some serious revisionism going on here. Bubsy was never considered as on top as Mario is, but back then, he was considered decent at worst and fun at best. 3D is the only really bad game in the series, but now, people act as if Bubsy was a constant failure, to the point some people are ready to crap on 4D when it will release, just to think they're hilarious, when that's just pathetic behavior.
Sonic would know that pain, given many spit on either all of the 3D games in his series or even all of his games, for even the pettiest reasons.
@Mgalens yea a shame that some dismiss them bc they try to play them like a Mario game. Having such a unique take on a common genre like platformers is part of what made gaming in the 90s so great.
@FlyingDunsparce I really appreciate your level-headed response, and you explained your position quite well to wear I now see where you are coming from, too. Particularly since I think mine was a bit more antagonistic than it should have been. My apologies.
It is an interesting debate to have. I know I sometimes get confused or disappointed when a game that was previously given a 10/10 gets a re-release and winds up with an 8 or something. Obviously there are other factors at play, like different reviewers or different sensibilities in a contemporary evaluation, but I am sometimes left feeling like, "This is a 'perfect' game, why knock it down a peg?" That feels similar to what you're saying here. So the game is being evaluated for what it offers now, with a score being given to reflect their opinion on that. I suppose their "Joys" and "Cons" system - for which I love the pun, by the way - doesn't give us much specific insight into how every component was rated. For all we know, the "4" represents an "Outstanding" rating for the presentation and the package. And everything else was utter crap. Ha. I guess that's why it's also useful to read the written review, where an explanation is often given for their thought process. Here, they did commend the developers on the presentation. It sounds like it's just that the content is so bad, it makes the competent production seem superfluous. Anyway, good chat. Your argument is valid.
@SpaceboyScreams Thing is the original Mega Drive Sonic are classics that have aged well and are still very playable, Bubsy on the otherhand was bad even back then, with the PS1 game being one that system's worst looking and playing games, it looks like a jaguar game..the jaguar Bubsy had the same issues as the 1st game despite being a sequel I like they made some effort with Bubsy 3D to improve it but honestly all the games needed to be redesigned to be made playable, there's a chance the new game might be the first good Bubsy game but this collection is only good for archive history not really played for fun, I mean I guess one good thing is this is cheaper then getting the original games off eBay.
This scored higher than the review made it sound. Haha
I think I liked Bubsy 2 because of the co-op mode. That was my criteria for a lot of games back then. Not a great game though, but an ok one. The first one was just so frustrating.
Great review though. Very funny.
@TitanSix Streamers. I can imagine streamers picking it up to play and getting frustrated for their audience's entertainment. Other than that... I’m not sure who was really asking for it.
@MirrorFate2 Sonic Origins got the 8/10 cus the actual games are solid and people want a easy way to play them, even if it's a buggy and overpriced mess, but with Bubsy you got solid emulation, tons of cool history stuff there's a improved version of Bubsy 3D but the games themselves are pretty badly designed games, the only way to fix them would be make a game that doesn't suck Bubsy 4D could such a game I think Bubsy did have a lot of potential but I think the biggest issue is the gameplay and level design itself where it's so easy for Bubsy to get the 1 hit deaths...think the animation for the deaths were better than playing it, there's a good reason why no one re release any of his games after the PS1 game, but bad 90s games sell now looking at the LJN license games getting modern re releases that's this exists..
@N00BiSH
Aw, nuts!. Cat is out of the bag. I'm outwa here.
I love bad 90s games, but the ones I like are "so bad, it's good" games. Bubsy is just...bad.
These games stunk then and they stink now. Stink, stank, stunk no amount of time will make these games fun or any good. 4 is generous
@BaldB3lper78 Excellent review though
@MirrorFate2 The problems mentioned in the review are not petty; they are objective perspectives from what a platform gamer expects of their genre.
@The_Nintendo_Pedant He is speaking more about nostalgia of old videogames in general, l think.
@Elbow Probably will be on Game Pass at some point
Off hand I can’t really think of another game that has ever accomplished multiple installments and seeing little to no improvement. How did this game survive this long, and there’s still another Bunsy on the horizon, that one could be good but it’s truly stunning Bubsy is still standing when their are other great one hit wonders that just never got a sequel. Metal Arms, Kickle Cubicle, Freedom Fighters, Tonic Troubles, Mischief Makers, and Blast Corps just to name a few.
@Erigen Modern Atari are actually doing really well for themselves financially. They've made some very shrewd investments in Nightdive and Digital Eclipse, their retro mini consoles have sold really well and their recent remakes have been very well received.
It seems like you have an issue where there isn't one.
@Pak-Man
I agree!
therefore, all the reviewer had to say, was "let's get this out of the way right off: the Bubsy games are not good, technically."
then, the rest of the review could be about the compilation/package, which honestly is the only reason to review a release like this in the first place
Oh Bubsy, the games are so bad I kinda do want to revisit them for that alone. If this collection ever goes on sale for like, 2 dollars, I would get it.
Still beats that Glover "remaster" lol
This collection is the Monkeys Paw of game preservation.
we got this before a mega man legends collection; that should give it a bonus point
This is more like a "well, what did you expect?" situation.
It's like ordering a sandwich made of poop, and then complaining that the sandwich is made out of poop.
@TYRANACLES Because the first two games were actually well reviewed and pretty popular. It was 3D where everything fell apart. The assertion that "none" of the games were good is a modern meme.
A copy of Bubsy for SNES is like 15 bucks on eBay. Not sure why we need to revisit these games. Now, Metal Warriors on the other hand…
Lastly, I hear those that want to preserve good games, but this? No thank you.
I mean this isn't the first crap collection to hit the market, especially from LRG less we forget but a few short years ago they put out the Bill and Ted collection, a pair of awful games that there was no reason to rerelease. There may be some nostalgia for some, but the only reason to get this is the morbid curiosity of how bad Bubsy 3D is.
@Suketoudara Sadly, no one is gonna listen to us, they prefer to use the popular opinion instead of doing research or making their own opinion.
I played the first game more recently and I think it's fine. I found it to be kind of middle-of-the-road rather than terrible.
I didn't even realize there was a Gameboy game, though? At least the collection is comprehensive for the era in that regard.
Positively chuffed to get this collection, and this is coming from someone who rented AND HATED Bubsy II multiple times as a child (but really liked the box art for some reason) and can count Bubsy 3D as the only game ever to literally make me vomit.
There's absolutely room for bad games to be remembered and even celebrated, and I am all here for it. Also Bubsy: Paws on Fire was pretty good and Bubsy 4D looks stellar.
@Scposteel the Bill and Ted collection was particularly egregious.
Apart from the fact the games are bad (though I've heard the GB game is the better of the 2), LRG only had the license for 2 years that started running during development. It took them a year and 2 months to release the collection. Yes, somehow an NES and a GB game took them that much time. Which in turn made the collection available only for 10 months before being delisted.
Honest to God i wish I’d read this first. Wasted £16 on this dreck
@FlyingDunsparce You raise an excellent point. If one good game is in there and would have been sold seperately, score it as the rest being bonus. Unless the rest being there increases the price of the product, then it might be lower as well...
Anyways, I see others have continued the discussion in a lot of ways and right now I don't have the time to read all, but from the small parts I am reading, I seem to agree with most people here.
Anyways, I am unfortunately too busy to get into it, as much as I enjoy this kind of banter.
@Tom-Massey
I'll be honest. I don't have any particular nostalgia for Bubsy, but I was excited for this release. (I still am really. I pre-ordered a physical copy.) I didn't expect the collection to get a great score, but I didn't expect this either.
My main takeaways are:
a.) You don't like Bubsy.
b.) You don't think this collection should exist.
c.) You think Japanese game developers are superior to Western ones.
Am I wrong?
I don’t remember the music in md tazmania being that bad. Thought it was a pretty good game. If it was that bad I would have thought I would remember it.
Hello Nintendo Life commenters, thanks so much to all of you who read the review through. I'm just going to chime in briefly and answer a few of your points:
@SaintLewis73 @Gamer_Griff @JohnnyMind @Shepdawg1 @AStupidID @Antraxx777
I'm glad you enjoyed the read guys, and I very much appreciate your comments.
I can see that the vast majority here agree with the review and its reasoning, but I'll address a few of the points made to the contrary:
@FlyingDunsparce @Suketoudara @The_Nintendo_Pedant
Hello guys! re: your comments about the score being unfair, let me break that down for you. You cited that the score should be given based on emulation quality and presentation, rather than the content. If that was the case, this would be an 8. Now, imagine someone who knows nothing about the Bubsy series, who doesn't read the review and only looks at the scoreline (which, sadly, is 99% of people) and buys it based on an 8. That isn't just professional suicide on my part, but completely unethical. I'm unsure how you formulated the idea of a nostalgia collection being scored on presentation alone, but I can assure you that angle isn't my job description! I'm meant to shine a light on what you're getting for your money. In this case: decent presentation, solid emulation quality, a few modern tweaks, and five utterly dreadful games that most won't play more than 10 minutes a piece. Hope that makes sense.
@Suketoudara @The_Nintendo_Pedant
"I'd argue that people who HATE a certain game series (as the reviewer seems to) aren't best suited to review a collection of them in the first place."
You both said a game shouldn't be given to a reviewer who "hates it", but why would you assume that's the case? The review is very thorough in its analytical breakdown, and, if you read it, you'll find the exact points of failure are detailed exhaustingly. I spent a (torturous) number of hours playing and making notes to be able expound on the games' pros and cons. This isn't from a place of hate, more just wanting to get the job done right.
A reviewer hating a game is a common misunderstanding though, because the scoreline can lead to that assumption. While I remember Bubsy being awful, and much maligned over the years, I (and I hope every other reviewer) approaches coverage of famously bad material in a "ready-to-be-proven-wrong" mindset. For Bubsy, it was exactly this. Only after exhausting all avenues I wasn't proven wrong because frankly, these games really do suck.
I'm usually chosen to cover retro and retro-style games here because I this is my field. I assure you, I'm the right person to be honest about this and not mislead anyone!
@Suketoudara
Just to pick up on this comment:
"The fact that the review contains a major error in saying all the Bubsy games are here (there's two games missing) perhaps justifies my view."
The review says:
"The Purrfect Collection combines five Bubsy *retro titles" in the preceding paragraph"
The following paragraph opens with *"Every Bubsy release is here..."
According to my original draft, this has been changed, possibly by my editor (EDIT: He’s innocent, I stupidly changed it from the original draft) from "Every Bubsy version is here", including those cross-platform entries on Super Nintendo and Mega Drive".
Either way, it's not unclear what's in the package: the review goes on to cover each and every entry.
@Suketoudara
"Because the first two games were actually well reviewed and pretty popular. "
They are both utterly dreadful. Don't take 90s game reviews as gospel, it was a very different landscape back then. The guys having to write this stuff did so to tight deadlines for little to no money, and, when scoring, kind of guessed the way their colleagues would go and the general audience reaction to yet another anthropomorphic platform game character in a bouncy, colourful world. Chances are they played it for 20 minutes so they could talk about the graphics. These days we're afforded a much greater opportunity to deep dive. This is a good thing!
@ElkinFencer10
"I love bad 90s games, but the ones I like are "so bad, it's good" games. Bubsy is just...bad."
A perfect summary!
My only experience with Bubsy until now are demo stations back in the day and a some hours with the first game a couple of years ago (in which I found it quite decent), so I don't habe enough information and impression to actually review it (and haven't played the sequels yet).
That said, while I normally really enjoy the "feel" of Nintendo life reviews, this was an oddly mean-spirited one (reminding me of the Hardcore Gaming 101 article about the series in this respect) I can't say I enjoyed to read because it leaned so heavily into AVGN style and the "Bubsy is the worst gaming series ever LOL" meme.
As others here already pointed out, the first two games got decent to good reviews back then, the Jaguar one was reviewed more lukewarm (but not exactly bad) for being so similar to the first one despite running on a much stronger console, and the 3D was the only really infamous one. The bashing of Bubsy as a whole while saying that all gamers always hated the series with a passion is a relatively recent phenomenon. Not that this context is relevant to a modern review, mind you, but I found it quite odd that said review seemed to have a strong "you know, everybode hated Bubsy everytime" subtext.
@TheBigYin
It was published day one! You moved much too quickly
@KainXavier
a.) You don't like Bubsy. - Whatever there is to like was summarised in the final paragraph. It's not easy to like the games, as they're terribly coded and constructed.
b.) You don't think this collection should exist. - The reason for the existence of the collection is made clear in the conclusion. Everyone else not meeting that criteria need not apply
c.) You think Japanese game developers are superior to Western ones. - During the 80s and 90s this is unquestionably the case: We know now, historically, that Japan was producing the absolute cream of the crop. Bubsy is an interesting case-in-point, whereby the team struggled to implement sufficient character movement and jumping mechanics through three primary releases.
@OldMacMario
I'll direct you to the reply just above your post. That should provide some clarity!
Have a good day, folks. Appreciate the discussion even if we disagree.
@h3s
I'll let you revisit that one, good sir.
Ironcally I did get this for xmas 1993. Loved it and finished it soon after without too much trouble (unlike the reviewer lol). I personally never struggled at all. The rest of the bubsy games are horrid though lol
@The_Top_Loader
Kudos to you sir for your endeavour! However it does remain an objectively a bad game, for the reasons outlined in the review. I can’t analyse it based on the possibility that a person may persevere and work around its poorly crafted aspects; but rather how it stands objectively compared to others of its ilk released around the same time/era. By those metrics, it can’t possibly earn a recommendation from me.
Hope that makes sense!
@Tom-Massey
I can see your points, and agree to various extents.
honestly, going in I thought "I don't envy this reviewer." it's tough.
It almost calls for multiple scores, one for the game content and one for the "package." the review format as it stands really works better for new games, as standalone releases. but, that's not your fault and "it is what it is," to a certain extent.
obviously you've put a lot of thought and work into this, and at the end of the day, that's all I can ask! we appreciate your candor, and thoroughness in your replies.
thanks, Tom!
@The_Nintendo_Pedant
Sure! Well as long as the reasoning is clear. It’s different for people from the other side of the fence, because for me it’s wonderful and enjoyable to be able to write reviews for this kind of content, but it’s still a job. That means my perspective on how I’m informing a reader base or potential customer is crucial.
@TheBigYin is a perfect example of this. Not everyone knows the games and nobody thinks that Atari/Limited Run is aiming to only sell this collection to nostalgic, existing fans. So I need to think about those who may be tempted who know nothing about Bubsy, first and foremost. To that end, the quality of the games will inform the score, rather than the admittedly fine presentation and emulation quality.
@Tom-Massey
Loving your thoughtful and well-reasoned responses here. It's a breath of fresh air in a comment section that can often turn toxic the moment someone mentions the letters L, R, and G.
Tom-Massey wrote:
if someone presented me with an exquisitely hand-crafted, jewel-encrusted package that contained a festering, maggot-riddled dead rat, I still wouldn't be very impressed by the gesture as a whole.
@ElkinFencer10
I always like to have a chat about retro, and also some aspects of how reviewing has to work. There are always times where the actual goal of being honest and informative can be confusing if it’s not the outcome some people expect. So I’m fine to lay it out.
@Andee
Right, and in this case it’s really about two kinds of people: those who are in it for the love of the maggots, and everyone who isn’t expecting to get maggots. I tried to make that split clear in the conclusion.
This is one set of Mega Drive games I'm happy to not re-visit. I would rather play Robocop 3 on hard.
@Tom-Massey Pray tell how ANYONE except those that played this gash first time around is going to be interested? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt my son. This is worse than Scottish football and you're not man enough to admit it so don't go citing me for wasting £16. Zoomers won't want to touch this and I shouldn't have neither
@MaseSco Very wise
Disclaimer: I have never played Bubsy 3D.
Opinion: I love the Bubsy franchise! Bubsy 1 and 2 are objectively bad but subjectively awesome. Whoolies Strike Back and Paws on Fire were both super fun!!
I went all out and ordered the Im-Paws-ible collection for this release ^_^ I'm fine being part of the problem in this case
Why four points? Reads more like a two. Should get a two. Just for not crashing. I hate Bubsy. Did hate it back then, hate it now.
I ask the same questions every time this abomination of a character rears his ugly head: who in their right mind asked for this? Why does it exist? What are those people on and where can I get some?
@Tom-Massey Oh my man I wasn't here to rip apart the review. I was merely stating that I like it ! Many people that I interact with on youtube and the social medias have a similar opinion to both me and you as well. In my review of the game I actually said it was technically really bad but I still enjoy playing it. Hope this helps !
Anyway, back to Gollum
@MTMike87 It was also made for people like me who love the character of Bubsy. I personally enjoyed the Sega games but I also understand why everyone hates the franchise. That said I adore Bubsy as a character and this collection (especially the collectors edition) was a way to show my love for Bubsy and get some fun merch in the process
@Chocobo_Shepherd I'm happy to see I'm not the only one!
@TheBigYin
...yeah. I'm not sure we were even in disagreement. Unsure what you're getting at here.
@The_Top_Loader
No it's all good, just retro chat really. He's a famously divisive character as are the games. Sometimes I get the impression people enjoy them because they're rough, and it's more about the vibe and personality of the thing. I didn't struggle with them all too much though. Well, maybe the second one. The maze structure is just infuriatingly lazy design work!
@Suketoudara to each their own, I tried these both years ago and the movement felt way too slippery and with one hit deaths and gliding into pitfalls appearing from off screen, the games just weren’t fun then and really poor now. The rewind feature should help a LOT here tho.
@Tom-Massey
Reading through some of your comments here, it does seem like you're acting in good faith and not just trashing the games and the collection outright. That said, your response to me still leaves a lot to be desired.
Your conclusion and the last paragraph in it implied that this collection is only for those who were stuck playing Bubsy as kids because their parents weren't savvy enough to realize it was a terrible game. That's not only insulting, it's simply untrue. Also, if you meant that in jest, it didn't come across that way given the tone of the rest of your article.
That's probably why your comment about western developers rubbed me the wrong way too. I love Mario and Sonic, and I'm not going to pretend other Japanese companies like Capcom and Konami didn't also have excellent pedigrees when it came to platformers. But we're talking about 20 years worth of games, and dismissing western-developed ones is incredibly narrow-minded. (You're also ignoring all of the terrible stuff that came out of Japan.)
Is Pitfall not a good game? What about Jumpman and Miner 2049er? Wasn't Prince of Persia and Another World ground-breaking for their time? Did you forget about Crash, Spyro, and Tomb Raider too? There were also licensed games that were well received. (Alien 3 comes to mind.)
Lastly, the Bubsy games weren't developed by just one team, so it's not as simple as a group of people being (comically) inept at their jobs and somehow lucking into success. Moreover, every bad game has a story behind its development. For instance, Fractured Furry Tales started off as a port of Encounters, but the devs wanted to try to make an original game instead. I'm genuinely curious if the collection addresses any of this, and your review didn't answer that for me.
@KainXavier
Hey there, apologies for the late reply!
"Your conclusion and the last paragraph in it implied that this collection is only for those who were stuck playing Bubsy as kids because their parents weren't savvy enough to realize it was a terrible game."
Yes, sometimes I can (and do) embellish an article for the sake of humour and whimsy, and entertainment purposes. The notion of a kid hoping for Mario World and getting Bubsy is humorous enough, and considering the collection is scoring a four I didn't feel too bad about giving it a fun send-off.
"But we're talking about 20 years worth of games, and dismissing western-developed ones is incredibly narrow-minded. "
Oh, not at all. You've misinterpreted the parameters somewhat. Yes, Japan absolutely killed in the 80s and 90s and only lost their ground considerably when things went cinematic in the 00s (Hollywood-stylisation naturally wasn't their forte). Of course I'm not dismissing the Jeff Minters and Peter Molyneuxs of the world, but we need to look within the space of 2D action for an overall appraisal of east versus west. For every Flashback there was also a Chakan, and for every Mortal Kombat there was a Rise of the Robots. Japan had stinkers, and I've probably played most of them, but the historical library of today demonstrates a markedly stronger success rate in this field. I always like to throw the McDonald's game into the ring for this comparison: Treasure's Mcdonald's Land Adventure versus Mick & Mack Global Gladiators.
Anyway, it's not too much of an issue here, was just a contrasting observation really.
"Lastly, the Bubsy games weren't developed by just one team, so it's not as simple as a group of people being (comically) inept at their jobs and somehow lucking into success. Moreover, every bad game has a story behind its development. For instance, Fractured Furry Tales started off as a port of Encounters, but the devs wanted to try to make an original game instead. I'm genuinely curious if the collection addresses any of this, and your review didn't answer that for me."
Well it did address and answer all of that; it got a four. I'm not sure which of any individual was or wasn't inept at their job, but the finished product is lacklustre, and in some places I'd stretch to "comically inept", especially where Bubsy 3D is concerned. I'm still completely bewildered as to how the series held on so long or had so many entries, considering the quality of output, so "lucking into success" isn't too far off the mark in my opinion.
I try to limit reviews as near enough to 1200 words as that's kind of a sweet spot for readability. There are quite a few games in here to detail, so things like production backstories can't always make the cut unfortunately.
Hope this clears things up!
I'd be very interested in an interview with someone getting the super collectors edition, preferably with photos of the person's game room.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...